Intersubjectivity_acc Draft 1.0
Intersubjectivity/acc 主体间性加速共同宣言 Draft 1.0
共同作者：Akasha，
我们曾经都以为自己处于一个客观的世界，以为眼见为实，现实世界由实际的粒子组成。而不管是现代量子力学还是意识科学，以及后现代哲学思想和禅宗思想来看，更大的概率我们处于一个非客观实存的世界。这种现实和虚拟的扭曲性导致了现代社会中大量的混乱性不可解释的事件发生，意识形态的极度割裂和科学至上AI加速更加让个人主权成为可能，加剧了不同的微社会之间的割裂和个人主权之间的对抗。
我们需要共识。客观性的共识类似比特币和以太坊很好的解决了金融和货币领域的双花问题，从而从经济角度出发来让我们的金融和银行系统自由度更高，从而注入了新的流动性活力。主观性的共识类似AI和量子计算也快速让我们享受到计算带给我们边际成本的最大化的降低，从而几乎让我们使用能量的能力变得史无前例，但同时我们把很多共识建立在了主观实体的依赖之上。
客观共识的边界是比较明显的，明显会在非金融领域的拓展上遇见非常多的效率和适应性问题。而主观性共识的脆弱性也是非常明显，很多大的快速建设的经济体或者组织甚至会在一夜之内坍塌。为了结合这两种共识的特点，一方面让更多的能量进入到客观共识的世界，另外一方面让主观共识更加的充满了鲁棒性。我们共同提出了主体间性共识。
Intersubjectivity/acc Acceleration Manifesto Draft 1.0
Co-author: Akasha
We used to believe that we lived in an objective world, that "seeing is believing," and that the real world was made up of tangible particles. However, whether viewed through the lens of modern quantum mechanics, consciousness studies, postmodern philosophy, or Zen thought, it seems increasingly likely that we exist in a world that is not objectively real. This distortion between reality and virtuality has led to widespread confusion and inexplicable events in modern society. The extreme fragmentation of ideologies and the acceleration of AI driven by scientific supremacy have made individual sovereignty more feasible, exacerbating the division between micro-societies and the conflicts among individual sovereignties.
We need consensus. Objective consensus, as exemplified by Bitcoin and Ethereum, has effectively solved the double-spending problem in the financial and monetary domains. This, from an economic perspective, has increased the freedom of our financial and banking systems, injecting new vitality and liquidity into the economy. Subjective consensus, on the other hand, as seen in AI and quantum computing, has rapidly allowed us to reap the benefits of drastically reduced marginal costs brought by computation, enabling us to harness energy in unprecedented ways. However, much of our subjective consensus relies on the fragility of subjective entities.
The boundaries of objective consensus are relatively clear, and its expansion beyond financial domains faces numerous efficiency and adaptability challenges. Meanwhile, the fragility of subjective consensus is equally evident, with large, rapidly constructed economies or organizations capable of collapsing overnight. To combine the strengths of these two forms of consensus—on the one hand, channeling more energy into the realm of objective consensus, and on the other, making subjective consensus more robust—we jointly propose the concept of intersubjective consensus.
1）不二特性，圆融纠缠
2）哲科驱动，人文为本
3）开源思想，共创公共系统
4）AI加速，跨界科研，Super Align
5）个人所有权为基础，使用权为中心
6）多元激励，货币自由
7）人机共治，代码即法律，自抗审查
8）社区为先，团结我们
让我们共同纠缠出更高维度的新现实。
1) Non-duality and Holistic Entanglement
2) Philosophy and Science as Drivers, Humanity at the Core
3) Open-source Ideology and Collaborative Public Systems
4) AI Acceleration, Interdisciplinary Research, and Super Alignment
5) Personal Ownership as a Foundation, Usage Rights at the Center
6) Diverse Incentives and Monetary Freedom
7) Human-Machine Co-governance, Code as Law, Anti-censorship by Design
8) Community First, United We Stand
Let us entangle ourselves to co-create a higher-dimensional new reality.
客观与非客观：究竟何为真实？
共同作者：Akasha，Ada，Serena
我们曾以为自己处于一个完全清晰可感的客观世界，眼见为实，耳听为真。但从现代量子力学、意识科学，再到后现代哲学和禅宗思想的探讨来看，现实似乎远没有我们以为的那么稳定和“实在”。在量子力学中，“观测者效应”让我们意识到，物理系统的状态在被测量之前是不确定的；在意识研究中，心灵的感知与现实的建构之间的关系日益被重视；而后现代主义直接打破了我们对真理的统一信念，强调多元的、建构性的现实观。
这些理论共同指向了一个结论：我们可能并未生活在一个完全客观的“实存”世界。禅宗中“不立文字”“无物即无心”的非二元思想也早已指出，乃至“实”与“虚”的分别本身可能就是错误的。换句话说，现实与虚拟之间的界限并不绝对，而往往是主观建构的。
这种“非客观实在性”的视角不只是哲学理论，也深刻影响了当今社会。现在的世界正处在意识形态的极度分裂之中，社会中愈加普遍的“真相争夺战”，以及近来的Meme狂热，都表明我们对“现实”和“共识”的依赖正变得前所未有的脆弱。
这种崩解与割裂，表现在不同微社会、人群圈层间的彼此不信任与对抗，从而进一步冲击了我们对共识的追求与理解。
Objectivity and Intersubjectivity: What Is Reality?
Co-authors: Akasha, Ada, Serena
We once believed we lived in a clear, perceptible objective world where "seeing is believing" and "hearing is truth." Yet, insights from modern quantum mechanics, consciousness studies, postmodern philosophy, and Zen thought reveal that reality is far less stable and “solid” than we presumed. In quantum mechanics, the observer effect demonstrates that the state of a physical system remains indeterminate until measured. In consciousness studies, the relationship between perception and the construction of reality is increasingly emphasized. Postmodernism outright challenges the notion of a unified truth, advocating for a pluralistic and constructivist view of reality.
These theories converge toward a striking conclusion: we may not inhabit a world of purely objective “existence.” Zen teachings, such as the principles of “non-reliance on words” and “no object, no mind,” have long suggested that even the distinction between “real” and “illusory” may be inherently flawed. In other words, the boundary between reality and virtuality is not absolute but often subjectively constructed.
This perspective of “non-objective reality” is not merely a philosophical abstraction but has profound implications for contemporary society. The world today is marked by extreme ideological fragmentation. The pervasive “battle for truth” in social discourse and phenomena such as the recent meme frenzy indicate an unprecedented fragility in our reliance on “reality” and “consensus.”
This disintegration and division manifest as mutual distrust and confrontation among micro-societies and social groups, further undermining our pursuit and understanding of consensus.
共识的重塑：从客观到主观的延展
我们的社会结构基于共识而存在，尤其是在充满不确定性和分裂的时代，共识甚至变得愈发珍贵。从经济到技术，现代社会已经发展出两种最具代表性的共识形式——客观性共识和主观性共识。
客观性共识：清晰的规则与界限
比如，比特币带来的突破不仅在于它是数字货币，而在于它巧妙解决了“金融领域的双花问题”（一种指代数字资产被重复支配的核心技术难题）。通过共识算法，比特币和以太坊等区块链技术让去中心化的节点快速形成客观共识，彻底摒弃了传统银行系统中大量繁冗的中介步骤。而这种客观共识所体现出的优点是显而易见的：它标准化，可验证，能促使金融系统获得更大的流动性自由。
然而，客观共识的局限性同样清晰可见。我们很快发现，金融只是范围相对狭窄的一块。进入更加复杂和多样化的非金融领域（如文化、教育、社会治理等），高度标准化和规则化的客观性共识往往显得不那么适应，它缺乏灵活性和包容度，未能捕捉人类社会多样的主观体验。
主观性共识：以体验为核心的创新
与此对应，主观性共识建立在人们对世界的主观理解上，如个人感受、情感反应和社会文化背景。它并不依赖客观证据或严格的逻辑，例如meme就是一种主观共识。AI技术和量子计算加速了科技的推进，不仅降低了资源使用的边际成本，也推动了个性化体验的最大化。这种共识为人在社会中的创造性表达打开了全新的空间。
然而，主观性共识也面临巨大的脆弱性。例如，基于情感联系和快速兴起的组织、企业或文化社群，常常因为缺乏可靠的结构而最终崩塌——经济泡沫和某些技术驱动的组织消亡便最为典型。
The Reshaping of Consensus: Extending from Objectivity to Subjectivity
Our societal structures exist based on consensus, and in times of uncertainty and division, consensus becomes even more precious. From economics to technology, modern society has developed two of the most representative forms of consensus—objective consensus and subjective consensus.
Objective Consensus: Clear Rules and Boundaries
For instance, the breakthrough brought by Bitcoin lies not merely in its role as a digital currency but in its ingenious solution to the "double-spending problem" in finance—a core technical challenge of preventing digital assets from being spent more than once. Through consensus algorithms, blockchain technologies like Bitcoin and Ethereum enable decentralized nodes to rapidly form objective consensus, eliminating the need for numerous cumbersome intermediary steps in traditional banking systems. The advantages of such objective consensus are evident: it is standardized, verifiable, and facilitates greater liquidity and freedom in financial systems.
However, the limitations of objective consensus are equally clear. It quickly becomes apparent that finance is a relatively narrow domain. When applied to more complex and diverse non-financial fields, such as culture, education, and social governance, the highly standardized and rule-based nature of objective consensus often proves less adaptable. It lacks flexibility and inclusivity, failing to capture the diverse subjective experiences of human society.
Subjective Consensus: Innovation Centered on Experience
In contrast, subjective consensus is built on people's subjective understanding of the world, such as personal feelings, emotional responses, and sociocultural contexts. It does not rely on objective evidence or strict logic; for instance, memes are a form of subjective consensus. AI technologies and quantum computing have accelerated technological advancement, not only reducing the marginal cost of resource utilization but also maximizing personalized experiences. This type of consensus opens up entirely new spaces for creative expression in society.
However, subjective consensus also faces significant fragility. For example, organizations, enterprises, or cultural communities that arise quickly based on emotional connections often collapse due to a lack of reliable structures—economic bubbles and the demise of certain technology-driven organizations are the most typical examples.
主体间性共识：走向融合的未来
在面临客观与主观共识边界和脆弱性的挑战下，我们提出了“主体间性共识（Intersubjective Consensus）”的概念。该共识试图结合两种力量的优点，建构一个同时具有规则性与适应性的未来体系。它不仅涵盖技术、法规，还试图嵌入人类深层文化与伦理结构中，从而维持更广泛的社会统一性与持续发展的潜力。
主体间性共识的八大特性
- 不二特性，圆融纠缠
主体间性共识倡导一种非二元的全景式思维方式，在技术价值、经济价值与人文价值的共鸣中推动价值共识的诞生。每个人基于自身的主观体验定义“好东西”，而这些多样化的感受相互交织、互补，汇聚成为群体的普遍共识。这种价值的纠缠与融合，不仅驱动了社会的发展，更为人类文明的进步提供了新的路径。 - 哲科驱动，人文为本，去信而信
技术的发展离不开哲学与人文的反思。在历史长河中，每个时代的人类总是试图通过达成共识来寻找更好的生活方式。而回归“人”这一核心变量，是定义价值的根本所在。不断变化的时代图景中，正是每个人对美好生活的想象与追求，驱动了人类群体的协作，也推动着文明的不断演进。技术的设计、实施和应用应该始终围绕人类的需求、福祉和价值展开，尊重人的主体性。 - 开源思想，共创公共系统
主体间性共识强调技术开源与规则透明，主张通过去中心化的协作，共同打造公共基础设施。以太坊的智能合约系统便是一个生动的例子，它通过去中心化组织，将开放与透明的技术精神注入到公共领域，为未来的创新提供了范式。 - AI加速，跨界科研，Super Alignment
AI的发展与其广泛的社会影响力息息相关。为了确保技术符合人类整体福祉与伦理标准，而不偏离于单一商业利益的导向，我们需要在跨领域协作中实现高精度对齐（Super Alignment）。这要求大规模群体参与，集体决策，共同推动AI沿着符合全人类利益的方向发展。 - 个人所有权为基础，使用权为中心
主体间性共识将个人数字资产的所有权作为底层逻辑，并在此基础上探索数据使用权的深层价值。通过赋能数据的使用权，可以释放出更巨大的市场潜力，让每一位所有者从其数字经济活动中获得最大收益。 - 多元激励，货币自由
未来的货币网络应支持多元化激励机制，实现价值的更加跨界的自由流通。主体间性共识构建了一个多元货币体系和激励结构的设想，以打通更丰富的价值交换与创造关系，推动生产与合作模式的多样化。 - 人机共治，代码即法律，自抗审查
在未来的社会治理中，代码自治将逐步成为弥合社会信任鸿沟的重要工具。主体间性共识强调，AI与代码治理可以提供更高的透明性与抗审查性。这种模式不仅重塑人与人的信任，还将技术力量下的人类制度推向更加公平和开放的未来。 - 社区为先，团结我们
共识的核心始终是人类共同体的团结与相互尊重。从小型社区到全球化合作，我们需要优先凝聚起强有力的“我们”意识。在这份共同体情感之下，由“我们”携手打造通向共同福祉的桥梁，最终实现人类整体的向前迈进。
展望：文明的下一个节点
从最初的客观性共识和主观性共识，再到主体间性共识，人类正逐步探索跨越单一维度的社会协作模式。在这个巨变的时代，个体的生活如微尘般漂浮不定，却始终承载着意义和可能性。唯有在科技高速发展的同时，融入深刻的哲学思考与对个体的人文关怀，才能构建一个既富弹性又可持续的全球社会体系。
让我们共同纠缠出更高维度的新现实。
Subjective Consensus: Innovation Centered on Experience
In contrast, subjective consensus is built on people's subjective understanding of the world, such as personal feelings, emotional responses, and sociocultural contexts. It does not rely on objective evidence or strict logic; for instance, memes are a form of subjective consensus. AI technologies and quantum computing have accelerated technological advancement, not only reducing the marginal cost of resource utilization but also maximizing personalized experiences. This type of consensus opens up entirely new spaces for creative expression in society.
However, subjective consensus also faces significant fragility. For example, organizations, enterprises, or cultural communities that arise quickly based on emotional connections often collapse due to a lack of reliable structures—economic bubbles and the demise of certain technology-driven organizations are the most typical examples.
The Eight Characteristics of Intersubjective Consensus
1. Non-duality and Holistic Entanglement
Intersubjective consensus advocates for a non-dualistic, panoramic way of thinking, fostering the emergence of value consensus through the resonance of technological, economic, and humanistic values. Each person defines "good things" based on their subjective experiences, and these diverse perceptions intertwine and complement one another, converging into a universal consensus for the group. This entanglement and fusion of values not only drive social development but also provide new paths for the progress of human civilization.
2. Philosophy and Science as Drivers, Humanity at the Core
Technological development cannot be separated from philosophical and humanistic reflection. Throughout history, humanity has sought better ways of living by achieving consensus. Returning to the core variable of "human beings" is fundamental to defining value. In an ever-changing era, it is people's imagination and pursuit of a better life that drive collective collaboration and the continuous evolution of civilization. The design, implementation, and application of technology must always center around human needs, well-being, and values, respecting human subjectivity.
3. Open-source Ideology and Collaborative Public Systems
Intersubjective consensus emphasizes open-source technology and transparent rules, advocating for decentralized collaboration to build public infrastructure. Ethereum's smart contract system is a vivid example, injecting the spirit of openness and transparency into the public domain and providing a paradigm for future innovation.
4. AI Acceleration, Interdisciplinary Research, and Super Alignment
AI's development is closely tied to its broad societal impact. To ensure that technology aligns with overall human welfare and ethical standards rather than deviating toward singular commercial interests, we need high-precision alignment (Super Alignment) through interdisciplinary collaboration. This requires large-scale public participation, collective decision-making, and a shared effort to guide AI toward the interests of all humanity.
5. Personal Ownership as a Foundation, Usage Rights at the Center
Intersubjective consensus takes the ownership of personal digital assets as its underlying logic while exploring the deep value of data usage rights. Empowering the usage of data can unlock greater market potential, enabling every owner to maximize their benefits from digital economic activities.
6. Diverse Incentives and Monetary Freedom
Future monetary networks should support diversified incentive mechanisms, enabling freer cross-boundary value flows. Intersubjective consensus envisions a pluralistic currency system and incentive structure that facilitates richer value exchange and creation relationships, promoting diversity in production and collaboration models.
7. Human-Machine Co-governance, Code as Law, Anti-censorship by Design
In future social governance, code autonomy will gradually become a critical tool for bridging gaps in societal trust. Intersubjective consensus emphasizes that AI and code-based governance can provide greater transparency and resistance to censorship. This model not only redefines trust among people but also pushes human institutions underpinned by technological power toward a more equitable and open future.
8. Community First, United We Stand
The core of consensus is always the unity and mutual respect of the human community. From small-scale communities to global collaboration, it is essential to prioritize a strong sense of "we." Under this collective emotional bond, "we" can build bridges toward shared well-being, ultimately advancing humanity as a whole.
Outlook: The Next Node of Civilization
From the initial objective consensus and subjective consensus to the emerging intersubjective consensus, humanity is gradually exploring social collaboration models that transcend single dimensions. In this era of profound transformation, individual lives, though as transient as specks of dust, continue to carry meaning and potential. Only by integrating profound philosophical reflection and genuine humanistic care into the rapid advancement of technology can we build a resilient and sustainable global social system.
Let us entangle ourselves to co-create a higher-dimensional new reality.